I guess Nir Rosen is the latest poster child for "Stepped in it...big time."
While the world reels in shock over CBS reporter Lara Logan's sexual assault in Egypt, another American journalist is causing a different kind of outrage, calling Logan a "warmonger" who was simply trying to outdo Anderson Cooper.
Nir Rosen, an NYU fellow who has extensively covered the Iraq War, made the insensitive remarks during a Twitter rant on Tuesday. He has since resigned from the university's Center on Law and Security.
Rosen also has apologized.
I'm sure Rosen sincerely regrets those tweets, but I wonder, does he regret the dehumanization of Logan that made him feel free to write that crap to begin with? Because I think that's really the core issue here, assuming Rosen isn't some kind of sociopath. Make a charge and slap a label and then feel free to write what would otherwise be considered outrageous. And c'mon, there's not much more outrageous out there than joking about someone's brutal rape and beating.
Look at how he characterized Logan to justify what he was writing:
"...dedicate her career to promoting America's wars."
"...her role glorifying war."
"...we should at least remember her role as a major war monger."
Given Rosen's long history of vehement opposition to America's efforts in Afghanistan and Iraq it would not surprise me a bit if he had not just dehumanized Logan, she was probably somewhere below pond scum as far as he was concerned.
To be clear, I'm not singling Rosen out here as some unique example. I think the trap of dehumanizing people we disagree with is a risk that everyone faces. I know I've struggled with it at times. While there are truly human monsters out there, let's face it: Nearly all of the people we disagree with politically are really decent human beings.
That's not to say that all labels are bad or we can't call people out for bad behavior or opinions we disagree with, and to sometimes do that in anger or with passion. Heck, I called him a dirtbag over at The Swilling and I stand by that assessment. But he's a human dirtbag and I'm not wishing some horrible fate on him.
At the end of the day you should still be able to recognize that your political opponent is a person. If you can't, then you might want to take a step back and think about things. Because you're probably one easy and sudden momentary lapse of reason from the tweet or blog post that you'll quickly come to regret.
Update: Wow, now he takes the poster for "abject."
"Like most men, I need to be better educated and far more sensitive to the suffering of women and victims of sexual abuse."
Or, translated:
"Thank you Ma'am, may I have another!"
Read the whole thing, but geez, now I'm all contemptuous of both the initial offense and that apology. That's a pretty tough trick, because I'm not that much of an asshole when it comes to these things.
Recent Comments