Today is March 28, 2006. Yesterday, a USMC website posted a story about the Iraq Army making progress and starting to execute one of the most critical functions of any viable army; logistics. An operation occurred on March 23rd in Al Anbar Province in northwest Iraq, near a town named Ubaydi. Nothing flashy happened as the article notes. It does note this though:
Last week’s operation spawned another Iraqi Army achievement when soldiers executed their first logistics re-supply to six different battle positions the night prior to the operation.
“They [Iraq Army] will be able to run their own logistics convoys from now on,” White assured.
The success here comes on the heels of other recent achievements of Iraqi military units in western Al Anbar. Two weeks ago, an Iraqi Army company from 2nd Battalion, 2nd Brigade, conducted a similar independent operation in Khaffajiyah – a village along the Euphrates River about 90 miles east of the Syrian border.
A handful of Iraqi soldiers from 2nd Brigade in Al Asad recently graduated a three-week Humvee course and received 24 of the vehicles from the Iraqi Ministry of Defense – a step up from the unarmored pick-up trucks they were using.
Whether through logistics convoys, patrolling the streets or interacting with local residents, Iraqi soldiers here are on the path to success in this remote region of western Al Anbar Province.
“If the (Iraqi) battalion continues to do this well, there is no reason why they should not own this battle space by the end of the year,” said White, a 38-year-old from Seymour, Conn.
This is one of those things that isn't obviously a huge deal, but it really is as a sign of progress for the Iraqi Army. One that should be used as one of the benchmarks for progress in the Iraq War. If they not just maintain but expand this capability it's good news. If the capability is degraded or lost, it's bad news.
For most Americans though, it's no news. I found that story via a post by Bill Roggio. I did a google news search on "Ubaydi" tonight, limited to the last week. I got 5 results, only one of which, the referenced above Marine story, was relevant.
Why is that? Why, when I go to the New York Times website and search for "ubaydi", do I get 9 returns, the newest from 12/5/2005? Is it not news that the Iraq Army is becoming self-operating? It seems like news to me, even if it is a small scale. It has to start somewhere and it should be followed as a sign of progress or failure in Iraq. The NYTimes certainly has the resources, as do all the major media outlets, including FOX, to visit the Marine website linked above. There's nothing on this from them. Do they not go there? Is it not really news, of any import at all? Like I said, it seems like news, good news, to me.
The questions for the Big Media are these:
You mock citizen journalism as unschooled and undisciplined, but why did I get this story from Roggio and not from any of you? Is there something wrong with it? Wouldn't that in itself be a story?
Why should I trust you to tell me what's really going on in Iraq?
Why should I trust you about anything?
Recent Comments