I did my usual voting routine and went to my local polling place between 2:00 pm and 3:00. I was voter #763. In 2008 I was voter #1427 at 2:00 pm and in 2012 I was voter #1425 at 3:00 pm. There was no wait and only five of the 25 voting stations were occupied when I went in. I was in and out in five minutes...tops.
I have no doubt that a significant reason for such a large gap between now and 2012 is due to early voting. This is the first year that Minnesotans can vote by absentee ballot for any reason and it appears they have done so in record numbers. Almost 50% down is a big number however. I strongly doubt all of that is because of early voting and since it is a beautiful day the weather is not a factor. And unlike 2012 when reelecting Obama and rejecting an anti-gay marriage amendment motivated Democrats to turn out, the only ballot initiative this year is a constitutional amendment to put legislators' pay in the hands of a citizen panel(meh).
My precinct went for Obama by 2 to 1 in 2012 and I have no doubt that Hillarye will win it this year. But if turnout is severely depressed in this solidly Democratic precinct, that may be bad news for Hillary. It's also possible that Republicans in my precinct have gone "NeverTrump" and stayed home.
We'll have to wait and see when the officiaql numbers come out in the next few days.
This afternoon I will go to my local polling place and complete the mark next to Donald Trump's name. I can't quite get to the point where I can say I'm voting "for" Trump, but I can easily say what I'm voting against today.
I'm voting against a lazy, corrupt, and truly despicable national media that had a rollicking good time building Trump up in the primaries and then did everything they could to tear him down after he got the nomination. If Clinton wins, and I think she probably will, it will because the MSM collectively dragged her across the finish line. The revulsion and hatred directed at them is not the product of Trump whipping up the masses, the masses can see for themselves how in the tank the press is for Hillary. It's been an awesome party of the celebrity "journalists" and their editors and executives, but no matter who wins today there will be one hell of a hangover to deal with tomorrow.
I'm voting against a culture of corruption in Washington DC that passes 2000 page bills that were hashed out in backroom deals between aides and lobbyists and voted on before anybody had a chance to read them. A culture of corruption that hands both lawmaking and judicial review to faceless panels and commissions that citizens don't even see let alone vote for.
I'm voting against a culture of corruption that gives a wink and a nod to a former president getting $17 million to be an "honorary chairman" of an international multi-billion dollar, for-profit school company while his spouse is the United States Secretary of State. A culture that shrugs as the obvious pay-to-play allegations pile up and the Clinton's get richer and richer. The Clintons have blown past unseemly in turning graft into an art form.
I'm voting against all of the hypocrites who screamed bloody murder over Iraq, who held Bush and America to the standard of "You break it, you bought it" on Iraq, and then slithered away when Clinton and Obama broke Libya and let it become a humanitarian disaster.
I'm voting against a party and foreign policy establishment that casually tossed aside the chance for lasting political and military victory in Iraq and let that nation become a humanitarian disaster as well.
The bills are coming due for Obama's incompetence and fecklessness. Hillary will simply double down on them. I don't know that Trump will do better, but I do know that if he wins the news media will once again discover their power to hold politicians accountable instead of covering up for them. In fact, I'm quite certain that they will not just be unfair to Trump, they will be insufferable. I'll take that over four more years of lies and corruption. I'm voting against that.
Whatever happens, here's hoping for an election day free from terrorist attacks and bitter controversies.
This election was always about one over-riding issue under which all are subsumed. That issue is the corruption and virtual dissolution of our democratic republic by elites.
This election was and is about the rule of elites over the people, something we have all seen in full bloom in the WikiLeaks releases.
This rule by elites is, to say the least, very far gone, encompassing the media, Hollywood, the academy, Wall Street, Silicon Valley, much of corporate leadership, an unfortunate percentage of the religious establishment, both political parties to one degree or another, and just about every lever of power available in our society—except, perhaps, "We, the people..."
If it is not stopped now, it may never be.
I don't know about that last sentence, but he sums up my attitude toward what are supposed to be America's leaders.
The last year has seen a lot of ink and pixels devoted to figuring out why people support Donald Trump. I think no other candidate's backers have been scrutinized as intensely, in fact I don't think it's even close. They have been described as angry, or crazy, or fearful, or racist or all of that and more in some articles. This week James Kirchick argues at Tablet Magazine that they are just not very nice people.
It is preposterous to think that Trump supporters are created by economic or regional characteristics. The rural white working-class may be more susceptible to Trumpism than most people, but I doubt that preference is inherent. Hispanics are barred, but that’s an arbitrary, circumstantial ruling. I know lots of Hispanics who are born Trumpkins and many others who would support Trump tomorrow morning if given an opening to do so. Trumpism has nothing to do with class, ethnicity, or even gender. It appeals to a certain type of mind.
Kirchick has decided that "personal integrity," or more precisely the lack of it, is what defines the Trump supporter. He goes on to quote Dorothy Thompson on people who supported National Socialism in the 1930s and tries to make the case that Trump supporters today are of a similar mindset:
Ask yourself: Among the men you know who support Trump, are they unlikely to be bothered by their candidate’s lecherous musings and admitted sexual predation because they view women in a similarly odious fashion? As for the women who support Trump: Are they the kind who gravitate toward abusive men? Is the uncle or work colleague who always puts an emphasis on the president’s middle name backing Trump? “Kind, good, happy, gentlemanly, secure people never go Nazi,” Thompson observed. “But the frustrated and humiliated intellectual, the rich and scared speculator, the spoiled son, the labor tyrant, the fellow who has achieved success by smelling out the wind of success—they would all go Nazi in a crisis.” Much the same can be said of those who go Trump.
It's an interesting word for this election cycle, and a concept that has been widely used as a mallet against Trump and his supporters. As in "How can you vote for someone with such a lack of integrity?" Well, there's certainly some truth there, but a disappointed and cynical public has decided that integrity doesn't matter anymore, at least in national politics. It may even be a characteristic of a chump. And if you think this is just a Republican or Trump thing you're wrong. Democrats are being just as willfully blind to Clinton's just as serious flaws as well.
"Trump is a liar." Who cares anymore? The president looked America in the eye more than 30 times and deliberately lied to us that we could keep our health insurance plans and our doctors when he knew that Obamacare would impose mandates that would make that impossible. Hillary has lied so many times about her email server, besides so many other things, that it's tough to keep track. Lying has become a way of life for our political elites. People have watched the lies used to savage effect on decent politicians(Romney/McCain) with no damage to the liars and it's not surprising if the other side has decided that they don't care about lying as long as the candidate is lying for them.
"Trump is vulgar towards women and a misogynist." Some people have discounted that, at least partly, due to the media hysteria in presenting the stories. But I have no doubt that some people are shrugging because they aren't going to be lectured about propriety toward women by a bunch of assholes who unwaveringly support Bill Clinton and viciously attack his accusers. Why should they maintain their integrity on that issue when Democrats tossed theirs away 20 years ago and have never looked back?
"Trump will have a reckless foreign policy." More reckless than declaring Iraq a "success" and then walking away only to watch as it fell apart and ISIS rose? More reckless than taking out Gaddafi and leaving a bloody mess of terrorists in his place? More reckless than siding with the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt? More reckless than advocating a no-fly zone in Syria and therefore a likely conflict with Russia?
I could go on with a lot more, including all sorts of bad precedents set by Mr. "I've got a pen, and I've got a phone." If Trump wins Democrats will howl about his unilateral actions, but they have made that bed themselves. In fact, in important ways Democrats, their media allies, and the Republican establishment have created Donald Trump the candidate. We are witnessing a lack of integrity being met by lack of integrity on a massive scale. Fire fighting fire as they say.
James Kirchick wants to blame Trump supporters for a lack of integrity while ignoring his own. The truth is that there is precious little integrity left when it comes to politics this year, from the presidential candidates to the parties to the press to the voters themselves.
We will survive this election, but I'm worried that this is a symptom of an even deeper lack of integrity that is hollowing out our society. There's a growing lack of respect for truth and honesty when it butts up against our preferred politics and ideology. There's a growing lack of respect for each other when we are on opposite sides of issues. None of that is exactly new in American politics, but I don't believe I have ever seen it on this scale. I fear we have reached a tipping point in our politics akin total war, where all is fair.
“This is not about Huma’s e-mails,” a surrogate told me. “It’s about the e-mails generally. There’s a lot of things that got us to this point. But if Weiner hadn’t taken pictures of his weiner, we wouldn’t be in this thing.”
If the Clinton surrogate had stopped at “It’s about the e-mails generally" I might hold out some hope that the Clinton camp is capable of learning the real lesson of the email scandal, that she never should have needed to hide her emails from scrutiny on a private server in the first place. But the last sentence in the quote tells the real tale. That if Weiner hadn't screwed up again they would have gotten away with it legally and politically.
One week to election day 2016. This campaign cycle is the main reason it has been so quiet for so long around here. Like millions of Americans I have struggled to make sense of the news and events of the last 6 months or so. Every time I've thought I had figured a few things out the ground has shifted and I've gone back to square one before I could get a blog post out. Other things, good things, have been happening as well, but this extraordinary election has basically bottled up my writing. And truth be told, I've been avoiding some things I need to come to grips with regarding America and some of my fellow citizens.
I have a bad feeling about the next week. I have a bad feeling about the week after that too. Hell, I have a bad feeling about a lot of things and for as far as I can see. But the only thing I am certain about is the bad feeling won't go away after next Tuesday. While it will resolve some important uncertainties, it will create significant others in the process.
Will Trump and his supporters accept the results if Crooked Hillary wins? Will the people who have spent the last year demonizing him as the next coming of Hitler accept the results if Trump wins? Most years I would ask, 'What else are you going to do?" This year I'm afraid of the answer I would get. Too many people are out there itching for not just a fight, but a war, and they are not limited to a handful of nuts in the radical coffee house or the militia woods. No, I don't know any of them personally, but I'm seeing a lot more talk of violence in places that used to be free of such rhetoric. The ugly mood and air of violence are making it into mainstream opinion columns now. At least one columnist is actually stoking things up.
Here's Leonard Pitts, Jr. in his nationally syndicated column last week:
It is written, in other words, on an average day in the pest-ridden, plague-infected swamp of rumor, rancor, conspiracy and flat-out bollocks that now counts as Republican political discourse. More to the point, it is written out of concern over what and how the country will be after next week’s election.
So yeah, I don’t want the GOP defeated.
I want it immolated.
I want it razed to the foundation, reduced to a moonscape, left unlivable even for cockroaches, much less newts. I want it treated like boot heels treat ants and furnaces treat ice cubes, treated like a middle school basketball team playing the ’71-’72 Lakers.
Defeat is not enough. Let there be humiliation. Let there be pain.
You can read it in full context at the link, but basically somebody sent him a stupid email and some people behaved badly towards Obama on the internet. Oh, and Trump. This isn't the first time Pitts has penned an outrageous column and it won't be the last. And I might be able to come up with a similar rant by a nationally syndicated columnist on the right. But I think that sort of indulgence is particularly dangerous this year.
I have a bad feeling about the economy and stock markets as well. In fact, I've moved to cash in my IRAs and my dad has too with the exception of some guaranteed return funds he has through TIAA. Neither of us are in the mood to take the hit we took eight years ago and there's too much uncertainty and volatility these days, in the US and around the world. With some caveats, I'm optimistic for the US economy in the long-term. In the short-term I think there is very little upside and lots of potential downside in the markets. Besides the election and terrorist attacks to disrupt it, there is the probable belt tightening in retail spending as some consumers run out of room to avoid health care cost increases, potentially dangerous weakness in the European financial system, Middle East instability and opportunity for miscalculation between the US, Turkey, Russia, and Iran, similar opportunities for miscalculation in Pacific Asia, and doubts about China's economy. I could cite more, but I think that's enough for now. That's why I have moved what I can to cash in the short-term.
Another source of unease to me is the sense that as a society we have tipped into a sort on post-integrity status. Many of our important institutions no longer care about the truth or are run by, frankly, incompetent fools who are not held accountable. I have always had the feeling that no matter what bad thing happened to us as a country, we are rich enough and strong enough, and our institutions are trusted enough, that we can weather the storm. I'm not so sure about that anymore.
This is news that all decent humans can rejoice over, provided it's true:
A U.S.-led coalition airstrike May 6 targeted and killed Abu Wahib, the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant’s military emir for Iraq’s Anbar province, Pentagon Press Secretary Peter Cook said today.
The spokesman said Wahib is a former member of al-Qaida in Iraq and has been seen in ISIL execution videos.
That strike also killed three other ISIL jihadists, Cook said.
It is rare for me to hope that someone is burning in Hell, but this Abu Wahib, a pig shit waste of human flesh, definitely qualifies.
I became aware of him through the ISIS video below that shows him interrogating and then murdering three Syrian truck drivers in western Iraq in 2013. I'll warn you, like most ISIS propaganda videos it is shocking in its unvarnished depravity.
I hope those poor men have found the peace of God that will forever be denied to their murderer. Multiply them by who knows how thousands and you have a glimmer of the human cost of Obama's failure to keep us engaged in Iraq.
That video was also a sign of what was to come in Anbar province eight or nine months later. It was shocking to see that ISIS could operate openly in Iraq and shut down a major highway between that nation and Syria with impunity. They obviously had no fear that the Iraqi security forces would interrupt their savagery. Our intelligence agencies and military had to know about this situation, and yet America stood by and watched as it deteriorated into the disaster of 2014.
That's one of Obama's real legacies. If you love the man you should pray that God has mercy on his soul for his indifference.
Spring has officially arrived at my place. I fired up the grill for the first time this year and the menu was an ear of roasted sweet corn, roasted Yukon potato chunks, and a skewer of Kalbi marinated beef.
"The Humane Society of the United States is offering a $5,000 reward for information on who illegally killed three wolves in northern Minnesota, upping the ante in the ongoing investigation announced this week by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service."
That's in addition to $2500 already offered by the feds.
The Minnesota DNR has released an artist's sketch of the suspect:
For months I have patiently held to the opinion that when people finally had to make it count for real, Donald Trump's campaign would begin to deflate. Last week the good people of Iowa had me thinking that process had begun. Yesterday the Republicans and Independents of New Hampshire put the brakes on that in a big way. Sigh.
If I have to I will vote for Trump over Clinton or Sanders, easily, but I really don't want it to come down to that. I mean, this is one of the things he had to say last night as the results came in:
We are going to make our country so strong. We are going to start winning again. We don't win anymore as a country. We don't win on trade. We don't win with the military. We can't beat ISIS. We don't win with anything.
We are going to start winning again. And we're going to win so much, you are going to be so happy. We are going to make America so great again. Maybe greater than ever before.
What a load of crap. Politicians are noted for a lot of crap, of course, but this is worse than used car salesman level of crap. In my business career I have bought tens of millions of dollars of goods and services over thirty years, and I've had some real dirtbag salespeople sit across the desk from me. Everything about Trump, his language, his mannerisms, his bluster, all of it screams "dirtbag salesman" at me. I learned to trust that instinct a long time ago. The depressing problem is that Clinton and Sanders are even worse.
I will probably caucus for Ted Cruz on Super Tuesday. He's not my ideal candidate, and given the way the MSM hates him and is working overtime to denigrate him and raise his negatives, I'm not sure he can win. That MSM animosity is also a positive, however. Anybody who can so easily prompt Chris Mathews to go full frontal asshat on live television has something going for him in my book.
Most of the focus the last month has been on the problems with the Republican field, from Trump of course, to the size of the crowded field, to the grass roots-establishment rift. But Democrats have been having their own serious issues as well, even if they are not covered. Clinton's email issue is a far bigger problem than just classified emails stored on an unsecured server, as bad as that is. The very existence of the server was a giant slap at the notion of government accountability to the citizens and transparency through the Freedom of Information Act. The sole purpose of that server was to circumvent those principles and that by itself disqualifies Clinton from holding any office, let alone the Presidency.
The even larger problem for Democrats, however, is the looming Liberal-Progressive schism. Progressives have been on the rise in the Democratic Party for a long time, but I think we've reached the tipping point where they will dominate the party going forward. The problem for the party is that the two wings can only coexist as long as Liberalism dominates. That's because the Liberal wing has generally been willing and able to tolerate the Progressive wing, but the reverse will not be true. Progressivism at its core is collectivist and intolerant while Liberalism, though left-leaning, still revolves around individual rights and freedom. When Progressives take full control Liberals will have to choose between party or principles.
The time has come for several GOP candidates to drop out gracefully. It's time for Christie, Fiorina, and Carson to bow to reality and go home. Jeb Bush should do so as well, but he won't. Kasich has to play out the hand he drew yesterday, but it's not as good a hand as he wants to think. I predict he flops badly in the 9 southern/western states on Super Tuesday and he begins his informal campaign for VP shortly afterward.
I think Nicholas Kristoff is being mostly sincere in his attempt to bridge the gap between most gun owners and gun control advocates today in the NY Times, but he still falls far short, for reasons that start in the very first paragraph:
FOR those of us who argue in favor of gun safety laws, there are a few inconvenient facts.
The first inconvenient fact is the use of the term "gun safety," which gun owners immediately recognize as a euphemism for "gun control." Sure enough, Kristoff openly espouses the change in language a few paragraphs later:
Let’s also banish the term “gun control”: the better expression is “gun safety.”
No, it's not a better expression, it's a perversion of clear language and more proof of the dishonesty and ill-intent of the gun control crowd. "Gun safety" means the proper handling, maintenance, and storage of firearms. Keeping guns out of the hands of those ineligible to own them is not about gun safety, in all cases it's about gun control. I think Kristoff and other gun control advocates think they are being clever in resorting to euphemism, but it just makes them look like assholes to gun owners who are diligent in practicing real gun safety.
I give Kristoff credit for acknowledging some myths about assault rifles and open/concealed carry, but then he falls right back into "stuck on stupid" mode with universal background checks:
One of the puzzles of American politics is that most voters want gun regulation, but Congress resists. One poll found that 74 percent even of N.R.A. members favor universal background checks to acquire a gun.
It's not a puzzle at all to people who are paying attention, because it all depends on how "universal" is defined. If it is defined in the true sense of the word, one can't sell to or let a close family member borrow a gun without a background check. For most of us that's ridiculous, of course, and so support drops. For many, a background check for non-immediate family seems ridiculous too, so the "not so universal" reality grows. Then there are longtime friends and colleagues that would be required to undergo background checks, and so support drops some more. The truth is there has never been nearly as much support for "universal" backgrounds as gun control advocates claim.
And a note on the dishonesty of that 74 percent number Kristoff cited above. Politifact Wisconsin calls it "True," but notes the number comes from a 2013 Johns Hopkins poll of 2703 adults, of whom 169 self-identified as NRA members. I'm not even going to bother with finding out how the questions were worded, as claiming to know the attitudes of more than 4 million people based on such a ridiculously small sample of non-vetted respondents is essentially a lie.
And one more example of how dishonest gun control advocates often are, and why gun owners don't take them on their for anything. Anything.
At least Kristoff has the courage to bring up youth programs and outreach that might attempt to address the real problem with gun violence, which is mainly among poor and urban teens and young adults. That is progress of a sort.
So nice try, Nick, but overall your hackery and ignorance has done you in once more. Please try again, but next time, if you truly want to try to bridge the gap, talk to someone on the Second Amendment rights side who can tell you where you go off base. And then listen to them.
Here's the Secretary of Defense's statement on the release of the 10 US sailors by Iran this morning:
WASHINGTON, January 13, 2016 — Ten U.S. Navy sailors who were traveling from Kuwait to Bahrain yesterday when contact was lost with their pair of small craft are back in U.S. hands.
“I want to personally thank Secretary of State John Kerry for his diplomatic engagement with Iran to secure our sailors' swift return,” Defense Secretary Ash Carter said in a statement today. “Around the world, the U.S. Navy routinely provides assistance to foreign sailors in distress, and we appreciate the timely way in which this situation was resolved.”
A U.S. Naval Forces Central Command news release said the sailors departed Farsi Island shortly before 4 a.m. EST aboard the two riverine command boats they had been operating when they lost contact with the U.S. Navy. The sailors later were transferred ashore by U.S. Navy aircraft, the news release said, and other sailors took charge of boats and continued transiting toward Bahrain.
Well, I can tell you that what happened was that apparently, we had, from our military, one of the boats had engine failure and drifted into Iranian waters.
The Iranians picked up both boats as we have picked up Iranian boats where — that needed to be rescued and took them to — I’m not sure exactly where. I don’t want to misspeak here.
And realized they were there and distressed and said they were releasing and released them like ordinary nations would do. That is the way nations should do about it and that is why it’s important to have channels open.
A couple of things don't add up given the information we have so far.
First, according to the map in one BBC article, to wind up in Iranian waters while transiting from Kuwait to Bahrain the sailors would have to go what appears to be at least 50 miles offshore to the east. Why a small boat would wind up that far into the Persian Gulf to complete the stated mission seems rather bizarre to me.
Second, if one boat was disabled why didn't the other boat toss them a line and tow them away from Iranian waters? It doesn't seem plausible to me that that wasn't an option.
At a minimum there is more to this story that we haven't been told. The only question is whether our dullard news media will do their job or continue to be Obama's lapdogs.
As Knile Davis has just run back the opening kickoff all the way, here are my wild card week NFL playoff predictions:
#4 Houston vs #5 Kansas City
I'm not much of a fan of either team. KC has been hot lately and comes into the game with the #2 rushing offense in the AFC. But they also have the worst passing offense in the AFC. Meanwhile, Houston comes in with the AFC's #2 pass defense and #7 rushing defense. And Houston is at home. It could go either way, but I think Houston's defense overpowers the KC offense to advance.
#3 Cincinnatti vs #6 Pittsburgh
The only game I care about from a fantasy football standpoint this weekend.The Bengals #4 rushing offense against the Steelers #3 rushing defense. The Steelers #1 passing offense against the Bengals #10 passing defense. If Cincy QB AJ McCarren can keep his composure, I think the difference will be his #8 passing offense against the Steelers AFC worst passing defense. That and the absence of Deangelo Williams in the Steelers backfield gives the Bengals a chance to shake off that playoff curse and gain some confidence. I'm betting on the Bengals making it to the Super Bowl this year.
#3 Minnesota vs #6 Seattle
Everybody, I mean everybody is picking the Seahawks over the home team Vikings. Seattle leads the NFC in both pass and rush defense. The Vikings in the meantime, have the #3 rushing offense, but rank second to last in passing offense. Seattle's passing game is middling, even with the dangerous Doug Baldwin, but they do have the NFC's#2 rushing game. That was with Marshawn Lynch, however, who has been declared out for the game, and Thomas Rawls, who is done for the year. The Seahawks will rely on Christine Michael against the hard-hitting Vikings in the brutal cold at TCF Bank Stadium. This game will boil down to which team can hold onto the ball and move the sticks with the running game. It will be the legs of Michael/Wilson vs. Peterson/Bridgewater. I'm going with my home team in a surprise win.
#4 Washington vs #5 Green Bay
Washington brings the NFC's #6 passing offense while Green Bay comes in with the #4 passing defense. Beyond that the team stats are a sea of mediocrity. I give Green Bay the edge in this game based solely on the experience of Mike McCarthy and Aaron Rodgers and their ability to take advantage of the vulnerable Washington defense.
For the record, at this point I see Cincinnati and Carolina meeting in the Super Bowl.
I hope you and yours had a great holiday season and are off to a great start in 2016. "Mine" enjoyed the holidays, me not as much. However, a lot of hard work over the last quarter of 2015 and some scrimping and saving have me starting 2016 with a replenished financial cushion and even some money to start working on my goals for 2016.
As I've alluded to, last year I started driving for a rideshare company to make some extra money. I'll leave the name unmentioned for now, though you'll probably be able to guess at some point. I'll post some more details later, but suffice to say that once I got past the initial learning curve without managing to get into an accident or receive a major ticket it has been a good thing for me.
I worked a lot of the holiday season and all of the employer and house parties meant lots of business. Unfortunately, when I took Christmas Eve off an unbelievable coincidence occurred.
Last year I was hit with a bout of the norovirus right after Christmas Eve dinner. This year I even joked about it as we had wine and snacks before dinner. Everything was fine. And then, exactly one year later, I once again couldn't finish my plate, let alone go for seconds. By the time desert came around a thin film of sweat covered my forehead and to my growing dismay I realized I was in for a repeat of the year before. The thing about the norovirus, and this year was apparently a new strain, once you have it you no longer have any control. It will run its course and you might as well stand in front of a train as fight it. It was gone almost as quickly as it started and by morning I was eating lightly and able to keep down water, but Xmas Eve was ruined again. Thankfully, like last year, at least I didn't pass it along to anyone else.
With that, er, behind me, 2016 is starting off on a good note. I am well-positioned(knock on wood) to achieve some personal and professional goals with some more hard work. I don't expect it to be much of a fun year necessarily, but I'm hopeful that it can be a very productive and satisfying one.
Here's hoping you have the 2016 that works for you.